Cold Hand in Mine: Strange StoriesCold Hand in Mine: Strange Stories by Robert Aickman

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Firstly, this is a collection about death. Hence the title. In most of the stories the death is never explicit – it could be the protagonist’s, or it could be someone they know. It could be metaphorical, as in “The Swords”, or even imagined, as in “The Same Dog”, but the impact of these kinds of traumas are longer lasting. Don’t read these expecting to be entertained, because they aren’t really that kind of weird story. From his interviews and those of his friends, I get the impression that Aickman was explicitly uninterested in writing something people wanted to read – he wanted to explore concepts and create ‘art’, and this is the result. I mean, you get that impression from reading this collection anyway.

In most of the stories, Aickman uses the same elements to tie them together as an anthology, so they are best read in order for that reason. Very little actually happens – they are more fragmented expressions of Aickman’s musings on depression, guilt, and of course, sex, usually of the transgressive kind, which is all very 1960s-70s, against the ticking clock of mortality (literally, in the case of “The Clock Watcher”). We have a protagonist losing his virginity to a fairground girl (paid for), in “The Swords”, a couple of affairs, and off-page hints at paedophilia in “The Same Dog” (more on that below).

Expect casual racism that covers pretty much everyone who isn’t White British, with the one explicit reference that Jews are by and large alright and treating them badly is where the Nazis went wrong (a particularly pleasant male protagonist, and more or less the opening of “The Clock Watcher”). Women don’t have exciting or deep inner lives, and while Aickman uses a secondary character in “Niemandswasser” to express this opinion, it’s fairly obvious that this is an authorial view from the fact that none of his female protagonists *do* have a deep inner life.

All the primary female characters seem to be in flux or in a state of movement from presence to absence. There are echoes here of Aickman’s own issues around his mother’s absence from his life (she left when he was four, and a friend noted that this had a bigger impact on him than he himself thought it did). In fact, Aickman’s stories are often peppered with absences – an absence of explanation, an absence of people, and in the “Pages from a Young Girl’s Journal” story, the monster itself is absent entirely. Only its effect can be witnessed, both by the Young Girl and the reader. Similarly, the scream in the night in “The Hospice” is only heard, the death connected to it never seen, and nor is the body, enclosed in a coffin. In the few instances where the external horror is viewed directly, it is always a reflection of something (hinted at) within the protagonist.

You do get a lot of dreamlike, folkloric elements in each tale, spun together with tropes and stock characters. There is some of the expected Church of England ambiguity towards Roman Catholicism, and Aickman dabbles in the Gothic fiction tropes as well the Weird ones. Watch out for veiled fairy and corpse road folklore in “The Real Road to the Church”, and what read to me as some evidence of influences by Montague Summers (“The Same Dog” in particular owes its nastier elements, including the alleged/apparent molestation of a child, to a translated pamphlet on the Werewolf of Bedburg, reprinted by Summers in his book The Werewolf (1933)).

On this happy note, if American/other non-British readers are unfamiliar with what the phrase “interfered with” means, it invariably means sexual assault. That seems to have been missed in other reviews of this story (“The Same Dog”), and is pretty crucial because nearly all the stories are about sex and death together, and it’s the nastiness of this particular incident which happens to the protagonist’s best friend/first childhood sweetheart, not seen but only heard second-hand in the playground, that forms his childhood trauma. His fixation on his dead little friend (Mary) as an adult leads to him being asked outright by a male friend [without much judgement] if he’s “a Lolita” as in, is he as an adult attracted to little girls like Humbert in the Nabokov novel, which he denies, so there’s also that.

Anyway, if you’d still like to read the collection and their vaguely weird, fairly uncomfortable tales, go ahead, there’s a lot going on for stories in which very little goes on.

If you want to read story-by-story reviews by other users and my full, very spoilery, a bit tongue-in-cheek reviews of the stories themselves, they are here: https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/…

View all my reviews

Subscribe to my newsletter to stay updated! I send newsletters around once a month. You can also subscribe to my site so you don’t miss a post, but I also do a post round-up in my monthly newsletters, along with what I’ve been working on, what I’ve been reading, and what I’ve been watching. I will often update newsletter subscribers first with news, so stay ahead of the game with my announcements and discount codes, etc!

6 responses to “#AmReading: Goodreads Review of Robert Aickman, “Cold Hand In Mine””

  1. […] Cold Hand in Mine by Robert AickmanThe Divinity Student by Michael Cisco […]

  2. […] loved this collection of shorts tied together as a novel. Cold Hand in Mine by Robert Aickman (see my review here)FICTION NOVELS & GRAPHIC NOVELSVictorian Mistress [and the sequel, Nine Shillings] by Jesse […]

  3. […] eldritch Changes manifested, and there are some Robert Aickman influences in here. I had read COLD HAND IN MINE and reviewed it, and I think some of that tone and style found its way into this story. I was constantly thinking […]

  4. Your brief analysis here of “The Same Dog” is the best I’ve read today. I hadn’t considered the idea that, for adult Hilary to still pine for her, he seems to parallel the bald man who was attracted to the very same version of her.

    I’ve noticed how most Aickman readers tend to be so intimidated by his writing that they are afraid to commit to any concrete details in his stories. Thus, WordPress and Reddit threads are littered with vague “wink wink nudge nudge” comments offered in place of actual analysis, and often, they mix the likely corporeal details of Aickman’s narrative into a tale of delusion and/or mass hysteria, wherein nothing we are told is to be trusted. Thus, “The Same Dog” can be a story where Hilary has bifurcated his identity into two, making Mary the name of his female self. Or, that Hilary, in fact, magically becomes the tall bald man himself, capable of possessing her in a manner his young self cannot – only to revert to his younger self and forget the nasty bits. Or, that Hilary and Mary can see the dog because they just had sex for the first time! This last vein of analysis posits the dog as merely a signal emerging when Hilary is sexually responding to a situation, leading some readers on the path that requires Callcut to be Hilary’s object of homosexual desire. These readers feel empowered by invoking Freud, Proust and Aickman’s private life (albeit heterosexual) as part of a codex they can imprint onto the material, rather than interpreting it.

    Since Aickman, great as he is, is still fairly obscure, sincerely thoughtful analysis of his works is rare and precious. Your sorting process begins the same as mine: we believe that Aickman does offer corporeal incidents in his stories. He gives clues based on the specificity of his language, using words with a profound understanding of their meaning, making the dictionary the very codebook you need rather than the collected works of Proust. As you said, there really is no mistaking his intent on what had actually happened to Mary. Her fate is the catalyst, whereas Hilary’s imagination and innocence are indicators on where his understanding of events inevitably leads him. The mystery itself starts with the yellow dog – the same dog – and why a dog. Are the dog and the bald man one and the same?

    The location appears real, and, thanks to Callcut, the houses and names are apparently visible to others. Aickman could have had Hilary revisit the remote houses alone, but he includes Callcut, who doesn’t appear until the last quarter of the story. He serves primarily as a witness to events, rather than as a character possessing much psychological makeup to scrutinize. He certainly isn’t empathetic to the need for mapping a fantastical landscape upon one’s own backyard, but rather, states he prefers the peace of quiet. What makes Callcut’s place in the story most important is that he, and only he, saw the word “Maryland” imprinted as the name of the “dog house”. Such a detail truly puts “The Same Dog” in the realm of the uncanny, since Aickman chose to have the spectral elements appear all too concrete to more than just the surviving protagonist.

    Like David Lynch and Mark Frost with Twin Peaks, Aickman transforms the threat of sexual violence and resigned victimhood (or masochism) into both corporeal and supernatural manifestations, and that the distinction between the real and the spiritual are less important when they describe the same machine. In other words, it is of no comfort to make the assault and murder of a child the actions of a demonic beast, rather than simply a human that walks amongst us.

    But the story is about much more than this, and I don’t claim to have interpreted it so thoroughly that I would discount every alternate reading. I do believe that “The Same Dog” is rooted in real events and that the human mechanism to interpret reality is perpetually on trial. Mary’s visible purgatory certainly provides strong psychological insight into the story’s protagonist (he can see it because he believes it), but that Callcut is witness to the same phenomenon *and* corresponding details expands the story from one man’s view of the world to the world itself. That Mary’s union with her killer seems tangible is important. Her fate is just as meaningful as Hilary’s and Aickman asks us to reconcile this, rather than to focus on her as merely a mechanism through which to understand Hilary.

  5. Fantastic analysis. I’ve read this hours ago and I’ll try to keep this short as I’ve been pondering it for ages and need to re-read later.

    Firstly I’ve read some indepth accounts but something that I’ve not seen mentioned that hit me is when Mary says, ‘what are you crying about, he’s a friendly dog really’. To me that seemed like a flashback from perhaps the man saying that to Mary. Notice also how when they first see the dog it stares at them as if calculating hard in an ‘undoglike’ manner. I’ve learnt you can’t solve these stories like a Conan Doyle story but like you say they are clues. Also ‘it’s quite safe…’ She or the man says?

    It’s become clear to me the dog and the man are the same person, the descriptions are very similar. Everytime Hilary is crying out Mary don’t look like that or similar I see that as the flashback for when the man is upto no good. He has done something with Mary and he runs away he sees Hilary running.

    Also the description of the attack, interfered with and bitten and mauled could easily apply to what the man did. In 2nd world war period it wouldn’t have been reported in depth as someone pointed out on an article I read.

    I also find it sinster how Mrs Parker suddenly appears at his bedside and is almost trying to canvas what he knows. No one has seemed to mention in the things I have read how in such a leafy suburb they seem to be a lot of kids needing attention and playing truant. Has this guy done this before?

    To.me it’s clear what happened involved the man although it is maddening when they return and the dog is there and that is seen by his army buddy. But lastly Mary could have survived although why she’d want to live in that house I cannot answer.

    The whole culture of secrecy in the school and with his family. The fact that Mary is shaking before the dog even starts barking.. The bit about we must show no fear is that the man approaching? And also when Calcutt and Hilary are talking is the man known locally as he says, ‘you’re notnonenif those lolita types like old-what-not’?

    1. Oh yes! I think I have read somewhere talk about how this could be a werewolf type story but I’m not sure where that was! I think you’re right about this, it has made me want to re-read it (and the rest of this collection).

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from C. M. Rosens

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from C. M. Rosens

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading